Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Teimuraz Gabashvili vs Kimmer Coppejans Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gabashvili vs Coppejans analysis and find out who is favored!
Teimuraz Gabashvili vs Kimmer Coppejans Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gabashvili 1 - 0 Coppejans
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gabashvili has won 46.41% of points on their second serve, while Coppejans has won 48.21%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gabashvili, in recent form, has won 52.15% of their opponent's second serve points, while Coppejans has won 53.27%. The same stats for first serve returns are 44.27% and 28.18% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gabashvili has saved 48% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Coppejans has saved 64% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gabashvili has won 72.97% of matches played (W/L 27/ 10), with Coppejans winning 54.55% (W/L 18/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gabashvili has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 291/ 242), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 39% (W/L 12/ 19). Coppejans has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 292/ 190), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Gabashvili has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 72.97% of matches (W/L 27/ 10), where as Coppejans has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 10/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gabashvili winning 1 times and Coppejans being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Gabashvili winning 2 and Coppejans winning 1. The last match between Gabashvili and Coppejans was at the Manerbio Challenger, 07-08-2019, Second, Clay with Teimuraz Gabashvili getting the victory 5-7 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:42:19.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gabashvili and Coppejans have played a deciding set 1 times, with Gabashvili winning 1 times and Coppejans 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gabashvili winning 0, and Coppejans 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gabashvili has played against opponents with an average rank of 41.84 while Coppejans has played against players with an average rank of 236.48.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gabashvili has won 80% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Coppejans has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gabashvili has converted 42.31% of breakpoint opportunities, and Coppejans has converted 22.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
881
Rank
43
High
39
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
271
Rank
97
High
30
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
53% (662-592)
Career Total W/L
57% (418-314)
80% (8-2)
YTD W/L
50% (2-2)
$1,636,260
Career Prize Money
$294,830
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Gabashvili VS Coppejans H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Teimuraz Gabashvili | Kimmer Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:42:19 | 2:42:19 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (72/109) | 66% (69/104) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (45/72) | 58% (40/69) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (16/37) | 43% (15/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (7/16) | 42% (5/12) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (49/104) | 44% (48/109) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Gabashvili VS Coppejans H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
66%
(
72 of
109)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
104)
2
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
2
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
40 of
69)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
48 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
104)
110
Total Points Won
103
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Teimuraz Gabashvili | Kimmer Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 80% (8/2) | 50% (2/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 70% (16/7) | 40% (4/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 60% (129/87) | 48% (45/48) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 80% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.37 |
| Aces Total | 22 | 17 |
| DFs per game | 0.42 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 45 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:19:30 | 1:54:12 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 250.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (263/500) | 61% (174/286) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (181/263) | 72% (125/174) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (110/237) | 48% (54/112) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (33/78) | 23% (8/35) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (252/532) | 36% (119/327) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 80% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 80% (8/10) | 50% (2/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (3/3) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (6/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (6/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (4/2) | 50% (4/2) |
Teimuraz Gabashvili Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Maxim Mrva
Player
Teimuraz Gabashvili
46%
(
29 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Markus Molder
50%
(
34 of
68)
1st Serve %
50%
(
35 of
70)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
4-6 6-2 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Matteo Meneghetti
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
27%
(
7 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
51%
(
29 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Teimuraz Gabashvili
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Kanan Gasimov
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Luca Wiedenmann
52%
(
45 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
9
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
1
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Zekai Li
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 4-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Vishal Saravanan
43%
(
19 of
44)
1st Serve %
76%
(
25 of
33)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
2
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Kimmer Coppejans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Thiago Agustin Tirante
55%
(
65 of
119)
1st Serve %
68%
(
89 of
131)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
61 of
89)
50%
(
27 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
42 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
52 of
131)
129
Total Points Won
121
|
6-7(1) 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
80%
(
36 of
45)
10
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
15 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Lucas Poullain
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
96)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jose Statham
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
50%
(
18 of
36)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
17 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
39
Total Points Won
37
|
4-6 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
88)
6
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
12
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
96%
(
25 of
26)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
9 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
14 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
69%
(
79 of
115)
1st Serve %
67%
(
80 of
119)
10
Aces
18
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
59 of
80)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
36%
(
41 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
119)
115
Total Points Won
119
|
7-6(8) 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Titouan Droguet
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
14
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
26 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Gabashvili Vs Coppejans Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Gabashvili are available here and Coppejans photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
